Because all medical content is structured by an underlying terminology, sophisticated analysis and graphing is continuously available. Review results need to be communicated in the right way so that actions can be taken quickly. A Peer Evaluation Committee shouldn’t need to sit at a conference room table passing around spreadsheets. Instead, individuals can collaborate online, viewing rich dynamic graphs.

Graphs can be authored in the Authoring Tool just like templates. The Analysis module can display graphs in real time, with the ability to drill down into graphs from summaries to comparisons, all the way to original data sources. Categorized analysis of any clinical finding can be used to compare individual practitioner outcomes, for example, in looking at inappropriately managed complications or adverse outcome metrics.

Report templates can be authored in the same way as data capture templates. Graphs can be inserted inline and dynamically update based on underlying draft or final data, right up until final report signoff.

The peer evaluation committee gains knowledge, not just data.